Sunday, 30 March 2014

Eremoides bicristatus (Banks, 1924); or, Here be Dragons...

This was going to be a post about a fly (order Diptera, I mean), as I've rather neglected them. But as I doodled around, looking for a key to Afrotropical Promachus, I remembered something significantly more bizarre.

This:

Photographed in Chongwe, Lusaka, Zambia in October 2011, using Olympus E-420 DSLR, Zuiko 40-150mm lens and 3 KOOD magnifiers. Note the bizarre little 'wings' projecting from its thorax.

I can't find the Chewa name for this delightful insect, so we'll just launch straight into what it is in English; this is an Owlfly, a family closely related to the Antlions, which you may remember from this post about Hagenomyia tristis.

One of the downsides to this truly awesome group of insects is that there isn't a great deal of information on them, particularly the African groups, online. The most comprehensive I found was the Lacewing Digital Library, from which I was able to glean which species were recorded in the region - one of which had a distinctly promising name, and one unreferenced image on Flickr seemed promising, but wasn't enough to go on.
It occurred to me today that I might have better luck with the Royal Museum for Central Africa's Illustrated Database of Neuroptera, which, in an ambitious and reasonably user-friendly project, does have a surprising number of images of types either hosted or linked to.

But it didn't have images of the species with such a promising name. All it had was the name, a list of museums where specimens are held (which would be useful if I had access to them) and the original citation.

That part is important. You see, although most (all?) prestigious journals require a subscription before their most recent articles can be viewed, a man called Banks submitted an article to the Bulletin of the Museum of Comparitive Zoology at Harvard College back in the 1920s, and, some time after they published it, it was made freely available, with the entire issue it was published in, on the Biodiversity Heritage Library [link].

With that realisation, it didn't take long to find the original description for that teasingly close name. And it fit. And there was a diagram of a particularly distinctive feature of the newly described genus Erophanes, and it was only a few more clicks to discover that Erophanes, under its new name of Eremoides (Erophanes was already taken) has only one species. And so, ladies and gentlemen, I give you:



Eremoides bicristatus
(Banks, 1924)


Same time, same place, but with Olympus E-420 and Zuiko 40-150mm lens and no magnifiers.

We'll call it the Two-Crested Owlfly for now, a literal attempt to translate that into Chewa as kawiri-matsumba kadzidzi-mbebe (lit. 'twice-crests owl-fly'), but I'm tempted to use Kadzidzi-Tombolombo instead, meaning owl-dragonfly, as mbebe, unlike the English 'fly', is not all that general, and refers quite specifically to the houseflies and similar insects.The owl-flies live - and look - more like the (quite unrelated) dragonflies, and so it seems a more sensible name.

All that aside, and onwards with the taxonomy:

- Ascalaphini     
- Ascalaphinae    
- Ascalaphidae     
- Myrmeleontoidea
- Myrmeleontiformia
- Neuroptera              
- Neuropterida            
- Endopterygota           
- Eumetabola                  
- Neoptera                        
- Metapterygota                 
- Pterygota                           
- Dicondylia                          
- Insecta                                 
- Hexapoda                             
- Arthropoda                            
- Ecdysozoa                               
- Protostomia                              
See also Burtoa nilotica.
- Nephrozoa                                  
- Bilateralia                                     
- Eumetazoa                                     
- Animalia                                          
- Eukaryota                                         
And here's a rather shoddier picture of a female, just to be leaving you with:
 



And that's all, folks!







Two sites were of particular value in the identification of this species - first, the Lacewing Digital Library, from where I deduced the species with appropriate ranges, and then the Biodiversity Heritage Library, which allows free access to an astounding number of back-issues of major journals. But is currently hiccuping. Which may just be my computer.

No comments:

Post a Comment